You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sputum smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis: sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-4-475 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hedwiga F Swai, Ferdinand M Mugusi, Jessie K Mbwambo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 19% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,468,145
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,684
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,659
of 141,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#34
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.