↓ Skip to main content

Understanding local ethnic inequalities in childhood BMI through cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected local data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding local ethnic inequalities in childhood BMI through cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected local data
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7870-2
Authors

Marie Murphy, Rebecca Johnson, Nicholas R. Parsons, Wendy Robertson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,679,302
of 15,140,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,229
of 10,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,182
of 346,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#645
of 1,212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,140,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.