↓ Skip to main content

Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial
Published in
Critical Care, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2627-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

José M. Cisneros, Clara María Rosso-Fernández, Cristina Roca-Oporto, Gennaro De Pascale, Silvia Jiménez-Jorge, Esteban Fernández-Hinojosa, Dimitrios K. Matthaiou, Paula Ramírez, Ramón Ortiz Díaz-Miguel, Angel Estella, Massimo Antonelli, George Dimopoulos, José Garnacho-Montero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2019.
All research outputs
#979,982
of 14,561,944 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#956
of 4,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,381
of 332,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#146
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,561,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.