↓ Skip to main content

WSES consensus conference guidelines: monitoring and management of severe adult traumatic brain injury patients with polytrauma in the first 24 hours

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 425)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
400 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WSES consensus conference guidelines: monitoring and management of severe adult traumatic brain injury patients with polytrauma in the first 24 hours
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13017-019-0270-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Picetti, Edoardo, Rossi, Sandra, Abu-Zidan, Fikri M., Ansaloni, Luca, Armonda, Rocco, Baiocchi, Gian Luca, Bala, Miklosh, Balogh, Zsolt J., Berardino, Maurizio, Biffl, Walter L., Bouzat, Pierre, Buki, Andras, Ceresoli, Marco, Chesnut, Randall M., Chiara, Osvaldo, Citerio, Giuseppe, Coccolini, Federico, Coimbra, Raul, Di Saverio, Salomone, Fraga, Gustavo P., Gupta, Deepak, Helbok, Raimund, Hutchinson, Peter J., Kirkpatrick, Andrew W., Kinoshita, Takahiro, Kluger, Yoram, Leppaniemi, Ari, Maas, Andrew I. R., Maier, Ronald V., Minardi, Francesco, Moore, Ernest E., Myburgh, John A., Okonkwo, David O., Otomo, Yasuhiro, Rizoli, Sandro, Rubiano, Andres M., Sahuquillo, Juan, Sartelli, Massimo, Scalea, Thomas M., Servadei, Franco, Stahel, Philip F., Stocchetti, Nino, Taccone, Fabio S., Tonetti, Tommaso, Velmahos, George, Weber, Dieter, Catena, Fausto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 400 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 16%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 51%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#55,625
of 15,916,435 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,937
of 373,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,916,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.