You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feeding practices and risk factors for chronic infant undernutrition among refugees and migrants along the Thailand-Myanmar border: a mixed-methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7825-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. H. Hashmi, P. B. Nyein, K. Pilaseng, M. K. Paw, M. C. Darakamon, A. M. Min, P. Charunwatthana, F. Nosten, R. McGready, V. I. Carrara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Thailand | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 6% |
| Researcher | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 117 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 129 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,848,444
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,780
of 15,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,819
of 459,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#210
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.