↓ Skip to main content

Magmatic–hydrothermal origin of Nevada’s Carlin-type gold deposits

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magmatic–hydrothermal origin of Nevada’s Carlin-type gold deposits
Published in
Nature Geoscience, January 2011
DOI 10.1038/ngeo1064
Authors

John L. Muntean, Jean S. Cline, Adam C. Simon, Anthony A. Longo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Zambia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 237 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 18%
Researcher 24 10%
Other 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 156 65%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 <1%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,480,713
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#2,615
of 3,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,481
of 182,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.