↓ Skip to main content

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011968.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kotomi Sakai, Yuichi Yasufuku, Tomohiko Kamo, Erika Ota, Ryo Momosaki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,694,417
of 14,185,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,522
of 10,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,327
of 306,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,185,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.