↓ Skip to main content

What works to reduce inequalities in higher education? A systematic review of the (quasi-)experimental literature on outreach and financial aid

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 205)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What works to reduce inequalities in higher education? A systematic review of the (quasi-)experimental literature on outreach and financial aid
Published in
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100442
Authors

Estelle Herbaut, Koen Geven

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#436,249
of 13,995,463 outputs
Outputs from Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
#9
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,137
of 203,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,995,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them