You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
| Title |
Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AMA Journal of Ethics, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1065 |
| Pubmed ID |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 13% |
| Poland | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |