↓ Skip to main content

Assesment and interpretation of negative forelimb allometry in the evolution of non-avian Theropoda

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assesment and interpretation of negative forelimb allometry in the evolution of non-avian Theropoda
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12983-019-0342-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

José A. Palma Liberona, Sergio Soto-Acuña, Marco A. Mendez, Alexander O. Vargas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#948,200
of 15,437,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#66
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,251
of 355,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,437,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.