↓ Skip to main content

Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
271 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor
Published in
Nature Methods, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41592-019-0654-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A. Amezquita, Aaron T. L. Lun, Etienne Becht, Vince J. Carey, Lindsay N. Carpp, Ludwig Geistlinger, Federico Martini, Kevin Rue-Albrecht, Davide Risso, Charlotte Soneson, Levi Waldron, Hervé Pagès, Mike L. Smith, Wolfgang Huber, Martin Morgan, Raphael Gottardo, Stephanie C. Hicks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 27%
Researcher 58 26%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 19%
Computer Science 19 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 38 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#113,304
of 15,383,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#114
of 4,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,363
of 353,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#11
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,383,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.