You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-019-0654-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert A. Amezquita, Aaron T. L. Lun, Etienne Becht, Vince J. Carey, Lindsay N. Carpp, Ludwig Geistlinger, Federico Marini, Kevin Rue-Albrecht, Davide Risso, Charlotte Soneson, Levi Waldron, Hervé Pagès, Mike L. Smith, Wolfgang Huber, Martin Morgan, Raphael Gottardo, Stephanie C. Hicks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 248 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 84 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 8% |
| Germany | 10 | 4% |
| Australia | 10 | 4% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 147 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 97 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 799 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 799 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 177 | 22% |
| Researcher | 164 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 4% |
| Other | 89 | 11% |
| Unknown | 190 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 237 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 39 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 95 | 12% |
| Unknown | 220 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#269,300
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#263
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,287
of 482,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#8
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.