↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: Intra-abdominal hypertension: does it influence the physiology of prone ventilation?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: Intra-abdominal hypertension: does it influence the physiology of prone ventilation?
Published in
Critical Care, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Paolo Pelosi, Jan J De Waele, Manu LNG Malbrain, Chad G Ball, Maureen O Meade, Henry T Stelfox, Kevin B Laupland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Italy 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Other 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 31 28%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,390,979
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,749
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,977
of 103,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.