You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0909674106 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jon J. Smith, Stephen T. Hasiotis, Mary J. Kraus, Daniel T. Woody |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Chile | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 45 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,215,673
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,713
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,291
of 98,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#70
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.