↓ Skip to main content

Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0909674106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon J. Smith, Stephen T. Hasiotis, Mary J. Kraus, Daniel T. Woody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
Chile 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 99 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 14 12%
Professor 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 34%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 15 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#943,999
of 20,171,400 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#15,171
of 93,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,087
of 276,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#334
of 891 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,171,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 891 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.