↓ Skip to main content

Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0909674106
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. J. Smith, S. T. Hasiotis, M. J. Kraus, D. T. Woody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
Chile 2 2%
Belgium 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 79 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 40 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 31%
Unspecified 12 13%
Environmental Science 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,435,724
of 11,244,871 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#34,442
of 73,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,788
of 275,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#579
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,244,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.