↓ Skip to main content

Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transient dwarfism of soil fauna during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0909674106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon J. Smith, Stephen T. Hasiotis, Mary J. Kraus, Daniel T. Woody

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 2%
Chile 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 112 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Professor 10 8%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 35%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,215,673
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,713
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,291
of 98,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#70
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.