↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive behavioural therapy versus other psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
61 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive behavioural therapy versus other psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008712.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Jones, David Hacker, Irene Cormac, Alan Meaden, Claire B Irving, Jones C, Hacker D, Cormac I, Meaden A, Irving CB, Jones, Christopher, Hacker, David, Cormac, Irene, Meaden, Alan, Irving, Claire B

Abstract

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is now a recommended treatment for people with schizophrenia. This approach helps to link the person's distress and problem behaviours to underlying patterns of thinking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 29%
Student > Bachelor 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Unspecified 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#115,515
of 8,654,257 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#330
of 8,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#802
of 93,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,654,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.