You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correcting Misinformation About Neuroscience via Social Media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Communication, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1075547019890073 |
| Authors |
Ciarra N. Smith, Holli H. Seitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 37% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,124,017
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Science Communication
#62
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,803
of 479,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Communication
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them