You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of mosquito electrocuting traps as a safe alternative to the human landing catch for measuring human exposure to malaria vectors in Burkina Faso
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-3030-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Sanou, W. Moussa Guelbéogo, Luca Nelli, K. Hyacinth Toé, Soumanaba Zongo, Pierre Ouédraogo, Fatoumata Cissé, Nosrat Mirzai, Jason Matthiopoulos, N’falé Sagnon, Heather M. Ferguson |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Uganda | 1 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,003,001
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#395
of 5,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,876
of 459,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#10
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.