Title |
From painkiller to empathy killer: acetaminophen (paracetamol) reduces empathy for pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1093/scan/nsw057 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dominik Mischkowski, Jennifer Crocker, Baldwin M. Way |
Abstract |
Simulation theories of empathy hypothesize that empathizing with others' pain shares some overlapping psychological computations with the processing of one's own pain. Support for this perspective has largely relied on functional neuroimaging evidence of an overlap between activations during the experience of physical pain and empathy for other people's pain. Here, we extend the functional overlap perspective to the neurochemical level and test whether a common physical painkiller, acetaminophen (paracetamol), can reduce empathy for another's pain. In two double-blind placebo-controlled experiments, participants rated perceived pain, personal distress, and empathic concern in response to reading physical or social pain scenarios, witnessing ostracism in the lab, or visualizing another study participant receiving painful noise blasts. As hypothesized, acetaminophen reduced empathy in response to others' pain. Acetaminophen also reduced the unpleasantness of noise blasts delivered to the participant, which mediated acetaminophen's effects on empathy. Together, these findings suggest that the physical painkiller acetaminophen reduces empathy for pain and provide a new perspective on the neurochemical bases of empathy. Because empathy regulates prosocial and antisocial behavior, these drug-induced reductions in empathy raise concerns about the broader social side effects of acetaminophen, which is taken by almost a quarter of US adults each week. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 100 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 22 | 5% |
Canada | 17 | 4% |
Spain | 16 | 4% |
France | 12 | 3% |
Germany | 6 | 1% |
Ireland | 5 | 1% |
Australia | 5 | 1% |
Mexico | 5 | 1% |
Other | 59 | 13% |
Unknown | 193 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 360 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 9% |
Scientists | 30 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 14% |
Researcher | 19 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 20% |
Unknown | 45 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 91 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 29 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 11% |
Unknown | 54 | 22% |