↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing sequestered carbon in forest offset programs: balancing accounting stringency and participation

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing sequestered carbon in forest offset programs: balancing accounting stringency and participation
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13021-019-0131-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsey Wise, Eric Marland, Gregg Marland, Jason Hoyle, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana Ruseva, Jeffrey Colby, Timothy Kinlaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 25%
Computer Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#9,303,331
of 16,179,886 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#118
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,494
of 381,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,179,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.