↓ Skip to main content

Obesity and long term functional outcomes following elective total hip replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity and long term functional outcomes following elective total hip replacement
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-7-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather K Vincent, MaryBeth Horodyski, Peter Gearen, Richard Vlasak, Amanda N Seay, Bryan P Conrad, Kevin R Vincent

Abstract

Obesity rates continue to rise and more total hip arthroplasty procedures are being performed in progressively younger, obese patients. Hence, maintenance of long term physical function will become very important for quality of life, functional independence and hip prosthesis survival. Presently, there are no reviews of the long term efficacy of total hip arthroplasty on physical function. This review: 1) synopsized available data regarding obesity effects on long term functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty, and 2) suggested future directions for research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#465
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,343
of 175,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.