You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Additive manufacturing of ultrafine-grained high-strength titanium alloys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1783-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duyao Zhang, Dong Qiu, Mark A. Gibson, Yufeng Zheng, Hamish L. Fraser, David H. StJohn, Mark A. Easton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 83% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 652 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 652 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 19% |
| Researcher | 75 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 88 | 13% |
| Unknown | 225 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 186 | 29% |
| Engineering | 121 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Unknown | 278 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#261,083
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,658
of 98,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,070
of 480,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#335
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.