You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bismarck or Beveridge: a beauty contest between dinosaurs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-94 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jouke van der Zee, Madelon W Kroneman |
| Abstract |
Health systems delivery systems can be divided into two broad categories: National Health Services (NHS) on the one hand and Social Security (based) Health care systems (SSH) on the other hand. Existing literature is inconclusive about which system performs best. In this paper we would like to improve the evidence-base for discussion about pros and cons of NHS-systems versus SSH-system for health outcomes, expenditure and population satisfaction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,679,024
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,127
of 8,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,922
of 78,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.