↓ Skip to main content

Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
836 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Published in
PLoS Biology, December 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan S. Upham, Jacob A. Esselstyn, Walter Jetz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 836 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 22%
Student > Bachelor 49 15%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 41 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 13%
Environmental Science 41 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 6%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 56 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#42,529
of 17,465,371 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#110
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,412
of 402,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,465,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.