↓ Skip to main content

Furman at 45: Constitutional Challenges from California's Failure to (Again) Narrow Death Eligibility

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Furman at 45: Constitutional Challenges from California's Failure to (Again) Narrow Death Eligibility
Published in
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, November 2019
DOI 10.1111/jels.12234
Authors

David C. Baldus, George Woodworth, Catherine M. Grosso, Michael Laurence, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Richard Newell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,591,755
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#267
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,353
of 457,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.