↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing before Stress-Incontinence Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing before Stress-Incontinence Surgery
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1113595
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles W. Nager, Linda Brubaker, Heather J. Litman, Halina M. Zyczynski, R. Edward Varner, Cindy Amundsen, Larry T. Sirls, Peggy A. Norton, Amy M. Arisco, Toby C. Chai, Philippe Zimmern, Matthew D. Barber, Kimberly J. Dandreo, Shawn A. Menefee, Kimberly Kenton, Jerry Lowder, Holly E. Richter, Salil Khandwala, Ingrid Nygaard, Stephen R. Kraus, Harry W. Johnson, Gary E. Lemack, Marina Mihova, Michael E. Albo, Elizabeth Mueller, Gary Sutkin, Tracey S. Wilson, Yvonne Hsu, Thomas A. Rozanski, Leslie M. Rickey, David Rahn, Sharon Tennstedt, John W. Kusek, E. Ann Gormley, Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, Sirls LT, Norton PA, Arisco AM, Chai TC, Zimmern P, Barber MD, Dandreo KJ, Menefee SA, Kenton K, Lowder J, Richter HE, Khandwala S, Nygaard I, Kraus SR, Johnson HW, Lemack GE, Mihova M, Albo ME, Mueller E, Sutkin G, Wilson TS, Hsu Y, Rozanski TA, Rickey LM, Rahn D, Tennstedt S, Kusek JW, Gormley EA

Abstract

Urodynamic studies are commonly performed in women before surgery for stress urinary incontinence, but there is no good evidence that they improve outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 7%
Brazil 4 5%
Belgium 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 73 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 19%
Professor 14 16%
Student > Postgraduate 13 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 88%
Unspecified 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#271,162
of 8,261,086 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,685
of 20,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,449
of 94,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#106
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,261,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.