You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cyclic lava effusion during the 2018 eruption of Kīlauea Volcano
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.aay9070 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M R Patrick, H R Dietterich, J J Lyons, A K Diefenbach, C Parcheta, K R Anderson, A Namiki, I Sumita, B Shiro, J P Kauahikaua |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 29% |
New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
Italy | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 78% |
Scientists | 6 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
Researcher | 18 | 20% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#489,060
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Science
#11,835
of 82,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,689
of 473,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#182
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.