↓ Skip to main content

Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012348.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leeanne O'Hara, Emily R Smith, Jane Barlow, Nuala Livingstone, Nadeeja INS Herath, Yinghui Wei, Thees Frerich Spreckelsen, Geraldine Macdonald

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 45 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 58 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,480,463
of 16,490,270 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,116
of 11,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,645
of 389,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,490,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.