↓ Skip to main content

Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case

Overview of attention for article published in Electoral Studies, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 971)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
252 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case
Published in
Electoral Studies, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Authors

Diego Fossati, Edward Aspinall, Burhanuddin Muhtadi, Eve Warburton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 252 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 16 35%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 70%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2020.
All research outputs
#89,207
of 16,063,105 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#11
of 971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,249
of 375,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,063,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.