↓ Skip to main content

Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7844-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gudrun Sproesser, Matthew B. Ruby, Naomi Arbit, Charity S. Akotia, Marle dos Santos Alvarenga, Rachana Bhangaokar, Isato Furumitsu, Xiaomeng Hu, Sumio Imada, Gülbanu Kaptan, Martha Kaufer-Horwitz, Usha Menon, Claude Fischler, Paul Rozin, Harald T. Schupp, Britta Renner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#822,308
of 14,282,317 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#864
of 9,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,117
of 316,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#93
of 1,175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,282,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.