↓ Skip to main content

Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7844-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gudrun Sproesser, Matthew B. Ruby, Naomi Arbit, Charity S. Akotia, Marle dos Santos Alvarenga, Rachana Bhangaokar, Isato Furumitsu, Xiaomeng Hu, Sumio Imada, Gülbanu Kaptan, Martha Kaufer-Horwitz, Usha Menon, Claude Fischler, Paul Rozin, Harald T. Schupp, Britta Renner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 7 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 81 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 87 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#919,698
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#996
of 15,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,909
of 466,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.