↓ Skip to main content

Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7844-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gudrun Sproesser, Matthew B. Ruby, Naomi Arbit, Charity S. Akotia, Marle dos Santos Alvarenga, Rachana Bhangaokar, Isato Furumitsu, Xiaomeng Hu, Sumio Imada, Gülbanu Kaptan, Martha Kaufer-Horwitz, Usha Menon, Claude Fischler, Paul Rozin, Harald T. Schupp, Britta Renner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#923,539
of 15,569,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,006
of 10,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,174
of 357,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#121
of 1,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,569,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.