↓ Skip to main content

Towards common ground in the biodiversity–disease debate

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
46 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
Title
Towards common ground in the biodiversity–disease debate
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-1060-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason R. Rohr, David J. Civitello, Fletcher W. Halliday, Peter J. Hudson, Kevin D. Lafferty, Chelsea L. Wood, Erin A. Mordecai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#646,843
of 14,597,077 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#802
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,069
of 330,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#51
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,597,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 147.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.