↓ Skip to main content

Review of and Recommendations for Monitoring Contaminants and their Effects in the San Francisco Bay−Delta

Overview of attention for article published in San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of and Recommendations for Monitoring Contaminants and their Effects in the San Francisco Bay−Delta
Published in
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, December 2019
DOI 10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss4art2
Authors

Richard Connon, Simone Hasenbein, Susanne Brander, Helen Poynton, Erika Holland, Daniel Schlenk, James Orlando, Michelle Hladik, Tracy Collier, Nathaniel Scholz, John Incardona, Nancy Denslow, Amro Hamdoun, Sascha Nicklisch, Natàlia Garcia-Reyero, Edward Perkins, Evan Gallagher, Xin Deng, Dan Wang, Stephanie Fong, Richard Breuer, Mehrdad Hajibabei, James Brown, John Colbourne, Thomas Young, Gary Cherr, Andrew Whitehead, Anne Todgham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 41%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#11,036,688
of 17,083,063 outputs
Outputs from San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
#104
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,450
of 396,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,083,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them