↓ Skip to main content

Fecal microbiome as determinant of the effect of diet on colorectal cancer risk: comparison of meat-based versus pesco-vegetarian diets (the MeaTIc study)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fecal microbiome as determinant of the effect of diet on colorectal cancer risk: comparison of meat-based versus pesco-vegetarian diets (the MeaTIc study)
Published in
Trials, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3801-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Sofi, Monica Dinu, Giuditta Pagliai, Fabrice Pierre, Francoise Gueraud, Jildau Bowman, Philippe Gerard, Vincenzo Longo, Lisa Giovannelli, Giovanna Caderni, Carlotta de Filippo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#9,327,318
of 15,226,794 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,610
of 3,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,602
of 345,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#355
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,226,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.