↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,510)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
165 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0957-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman Kislov, Catherine Pope, Graham P. Martin, Paul M. Wilson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 25%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Social Sciences 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#212,791
of 15,996,322 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#17
of 1,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,082
of 372,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,996,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.