↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,690)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
166 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0957-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman Kislov, Catherine Pope, Graham P. Martin, Paul M. Wilson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Student > Master 11 6%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 33 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Psychology 14 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 44 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#328,481
of 21,792,010 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#21
of 1,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,905
of 432,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,792,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.