You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using the pea aphid Acrythociphon pisum as a tool for screening biological responses to chemicals and drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-2-185 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aviv Dombrovsky, Terence Neil Ledger, Gilbert Engler, Alain Robichon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 43% |
| Professor | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,753,240
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#985
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,133
of 99,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.