↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002239.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jawad Freites, Fiona Stewart, Muhammad Imran Omar, Atefeh Mashayekhi, Wael I Agur

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#683,736
of 14,288,811 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,056
of 10,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,266
of 315,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,288,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.