↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
36 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0702-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Bombard, Marc Clausen, Salma Shickh, Chloe Mighton, Selina Casalino, Theresa H. M. Kim, Sarah M. Muir, Lindsay Carlsson, Nancy Baxter, Adena Scheer, Christine Elser, Andrea Eisen, Seema Panchal, Tracy Graham, Melyssa Aronson, Carolyn Piccinin, Talia Mancuso, Kara Semotiuk, Michael Evans, June C. Carroll, Kenneth Offit, Mark Robson, Jada G. Hamilton, Emily Glogowski, Kasmintan Schrader, Raymond H. Kim, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Kevin E. Thorpe, Andreas Laupacis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 28 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 30 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#901,217
of 26,329,145 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#243
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,278
of 484,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,145 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.