↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0702-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Bombard, Marc Clausen, Salma Shickh, Chloe Mighton, Selina Casalino, Theresa H. M. Kim, Sarah M. Muir, Lindsay Carlsson, Nancy Baxter, Adena Scheer, Christine Elser, Andrea Eisen, Seema Panchal, Tracy Graham, Melyssa Aronson, Carolyn Piccinin, Talia Mancuso, Kara Semotiuk, Michael Evans, June C. Carroll, Kenneth Offit, Mark Robson, Jada G. Hamilton, Emily Glogowski, Kasmintan Schrader, Raymond H. Kim, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Kevin E. Thorpe, Andreas Laupacis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 38%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#430,859
of 16,064,742 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#158
of 2,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,224
of 374,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#8
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,064,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.