You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oseltamivir plus usual care versus usual care for influenza-like illness in primary care: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32982-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher C Butler, Alike W van der Velden, Emily Bongard, Benjamin R Saville, Jane Holmes, Samuel Coenen, Johanna Cook, Nick A Francis, Roger J Lewis, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Carl Llor, Sławomir Chlabicz, Christos Lionis, Bohumil Seifert, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Annelies Colliers, Rune Aabenhus, Lars Bjerrum, Nicolay Jonassen Harbin, Morten Lindbæk, Dominik Glinz, Heiner C Bucher, Bernadett Kovács, Ruta Radzeviciene Jurgute, Pia Touboul Lundgren, Paul Little, Andrew W Murphy, An De Sutter, Peter Openshaw, Menno D de Jong, Jason T Connor, Veerle Matheeussen, Margareta Ieven, Herman Goossens, Theo J Verheij |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 908 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 175 | 19% |
| United States | 49 | 5% |
| Spain | 31 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 3% |
| France | 16 | 2% |
| Ireland | 13 | 1% |
| Australia | 12 | 1% |
| Canada | 9 | <1% |
| Mexico | 9 | <1% |
| Other | 64 | 7% |
| Unknown | 503 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 769 | 85% |
| Scientists | 69 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 260 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 72 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 86 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#36,232
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#753
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#797
of 481,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#17
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.