↓ Skip to main content

NF-κB p50 subunit knockout impairs late LTP and alters long term memory in the mouse hippocampus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NF-κB p50 subunit knockout impairs late LTP and alters long term memory in the mouse hippocampus
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-13-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kensuke Oikawa, Gary L Odero, Eric Platt, Melanie Neuendorff, Avril Hatherell, Michael J Bernstein, Benedict C Albensi

Abstract

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a transcription factor typically expressed with two specific subunits (p50, p65). Investigators have reported that NF-κB is activated during the induction of in vitro long term potentiation (LTP), a paradigm of synaptic plasticity and correlate of memory, suggesting that NF-κB may be necessary for some aspects of memory encoding. Furthermore, NF-κB has been implicated as a potential requirement in behavioral tests of memory. Unfortunately, very little work has been done to explore the effects of deleting specific NF-κB subunits on memory. Studies have shown that NF-κB p50 subunit deletion (p50-/-) leads to memory deficits, however some recent studies suggest the contrary where p50-/- mice show enhanced memory in the Morris water maze (MWM). To more critically explore the role of the NF-κB p50 subunit in synaptic plasticity and memory, we assessed long term spatial memory in vivo using the MWM, and synaptic plasticity in vitro utilizing high frequency stimuli capable of eliciting LTP in slices from the hippocampus of NF-κB p50-/- versus their controls (p50+/+).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 37 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 10 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 49%
Neuroscience 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,448,452
of 25,134,448 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#530
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,176
of 168,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,134,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.