↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1248-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Millard, Anneliese Synnot, Julian Elliott, Sally Green, Steve McDonald, Tari Turner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Librarian 2 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Psychology 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,357,139
of 15,808,640 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#466
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,256
of 364,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#89
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,808,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.