You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tavaxy: Integrating Taverna and Galaxy workflows with cloud computing support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Abouelhoda, Shadi Alaa Issa, Moustafa Ghanem |
| Abstract |
Over the past decade the workflow system paradigm has evolved as an efficient and user-friendly approach for developing complex bioinformatics applications. Two popular workflow systems that have gained acceptance by the bioinformatics community are Taverna and Galaxy. Each system has a large user-base and supports an ever-growing repository of application workflows. However, workflows developed for one system cannot be imported and executed easily on the other. The lack of interoperability is due to differences in the models of computation, workflow languages, and architectures of both systems. This lack of interoperability limits sharing of workflows between the user communities and leads to duplication of development efforts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Sweden | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 11 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 144 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 28% |
| Researcher | 45 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 68 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,553,032
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#272
of 7,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,946
of 166,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#9
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.