↓ Skip to main content

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012646.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Gutierrez, Jose L Rodriguez, Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Linda C Novak, Rene Cano Hidalgo, Federico Graue

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 23%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,661,022
of 15,807,984 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,023
of 11,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,876
of 317,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,807,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.