↓ Skip to main content

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012646.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Gutierrez, Jose L Rodriguez, Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Linda C Novak, Rene Cano Hidalgo, Federico Graue

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,636,148
of 14,527,163 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,430
of 10,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,252
of 278,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,527,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.