↓ Skip to main content

Is science in danger of sanctifying the wolf?

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is science in danger of sanctifying the wolf?
Published in
Biological Conservation, June 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.003
Authors

L. David Mech

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Brazil 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 413 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 18%
Student > Bachelor 77 17%
Researcher 66 15%
Other 31 7%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 56 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 231 52%
Environmental Science 90 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 4%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 65 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#430,834
of 22,520,629 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#327
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,950
of 145,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,520,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.