An elastic second skin

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,722)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
259 news outlets
blogs
22 blogs
twitter
117 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages
googleplus
18 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
An elastic second skin
Published in
Nature Materials, May 2016
DOI 10.1038/nmat4635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Betty Yu, Soo-Young Kang, Ariya Akthakul, Nithin Ramadurai, Morgan Pilkenton, Alpesh Patel, Amir Nashat, Daniel G. Anderson, Fernanda H. Sakamoto, Barbara A. Gilchrest, R. Rox Anderson, Robert Langer, Yu, Betty, Kang, Soo-Young, Akthakul, Ariya, Ramadurai, Nithin, Pilkenton, Morgan, Patel, Alpesh, Nashat, Amir, Anderson, Daniel G, Sakamoto, Fernanda H, Gilchrest, Barbara A, Anderson, R Rox, Langer, Robert

Abstract

We report the synthesis and application of an elastic, wearable crosslinked polymer layer (XPL) that mimics the properties of normal, youthful skin. XPL is made of a tunable polysiloxane-based material that can be engineered with specific elasticity, contractility, adhesion, tensile strength and occlusivity. XPL can be topically applied, rapidly curing at the skin interface without the need for heat- or light-mediated activation. In a pilot human study, we examined the performance of a prototype XPL that has a tensile modulus matching normal skin responses at low strain (<40%), and that withstands elongations exceeding 250%, elastically recoiling with minimal strain-energy loss on repeated deformation. The application of XPL to the herniated lower eyelid fat pads of 12 subjects resulted in an average 2-grade decrease in herniation appearance in a 5-point severity scale. The XPL platform may offer advanced solutions to compromised skin barrier function, pharmaceutical delivery and wound dressings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
India 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 151 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 30%
Researcher 43 26%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 35 21%
Materials Science 31 19%
Engineering 27 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Other 36 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2272. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#164
of 7,458,716 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#1
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 264,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,458,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.