↓ Skip to main content

An elastic second skin

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 3,199)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
262 news outlets
blogs
22 blogs
twitter
109 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
20 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
An elastic second skin
Published in
Nature Materials, May 2016
DOI 10.1038/nmat4635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Betty Yu, Soo-Young Kang, Ariya Akthakul, Nithin Ramadurai, Morgan Pilkenton, Alpesh Patel, Amir Nashat, Daniel G. Anderson, Fernanda H. Sakamoto, Barbara A. Gilchrest, R. Rox Anderson, Robert Langer

Abstract

We report the synthesis and application of an elastic, wearable crosslinked polymer layer (XPL) that mimics the properties of normal, youthful skin. XPL is made of a tunable polysiloxane-based material that can be engineered with specific elasticity, contractility, adhesion, tensile strength and occlusivity. XPL can be topically applied, rapidly curing at the skin interface without the need for heat- or light-mediated activation. In a pilot human study, we examined the performance of a prototype XPL that has a tensile modulus matching normal skin responses at low strain (<40%), and that withstands elongations exceeding 250%, elastically recoiling with minimal strain-energy loss on repeated deformation. The application of XPL to the herniated lower eyelid fat pads of 12 subjects resulted in an average 2-grade decrease in herniation appearance in a 5-point severity scale. The XPL platform may offer advanced solutions to compromised skin barrier function, pharmaceutical delivery and wound dressings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
India 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 313 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 25%
Researcher 74 22%
Student > Master 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Professor 19 6%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 56 17%
Engineering 55 17%
Materials Science 55 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 7%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 52 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,057
of 15,354,969 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#1
of 3,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23
of 265,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,354,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.