↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic biospeckle analysis, a new tool for the fast screening of plant nematicide selectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic biospeckle analysis, a new tool for the fast screening of plant nematicide selectivity
Published in
Plant Methods, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0523-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicity E. O’Callaghan, Roy Neilson, Stuart A. MacFarlane, Lionel X. Dupuy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,800,330
of 17,986,329 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#713
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,577
of 398,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#119
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,986,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.