↓ Skip to main content

Splenectomy for people with thalassaemia major or intermedia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Splenectomy for people with thalassaemia major or intermedia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010517.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akshay Sharma, Manu Easow Mathew, Latika Puri

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 34%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,430,157
of 14,521,746 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,403
of 10,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,470
of 318,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,521,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.