↓ Skip to main content

Women's Education Level, Maternal Health Facilities, Abortion Legislation and Maternal Deaths: A Natural Experiment in Chile from 1957 to 2007

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
554 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women's Education Level, Maternal Health Facilities, Abortion Legislation and Maternal Deaths: A Natural Experiment in Chile from 1957 to 2007
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elard Koch, John Thorp, Miguel Bravo, Sebastián Gatica, Camila X. Romero, Hernán Aguilera, Ivonne Ahlers

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the main factors related to maternal mortality reduction in large time series available in Chile in context of the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 554 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Chile 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
India 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 197 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 28%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 47 22%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 35%
Social Sciences 37 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 5%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 38 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 536. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#36,520
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#612
of 193,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130
of 163,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#8
of 3,709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.