↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Electron Attachment as a Primary Mechanism For Toxicity Potentials of Halocarbons

Overview of attention for article published in Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Electron Attachment as a Primary Mechanism For Toxicity Potentials of Halocarbons
Published in
Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, March 2016
DOI 10.2174/1573409912666160120151627
Authors

Krishnan Balasubramanian, Subhash Basak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#859,965
of 13,266,991 outputs
Outputs from Current Computer-Aided Drug Design
#3
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,358
of 264,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Computer-Aided Drug Design
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,266,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.