↓ Skip to main content

The immune system in sporadic inclusion body myositis patients is not compromised by blood-flow restricted exercise training

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The immune system in sporadic inclusion body myositis patients is not compromised by blood-flow restricted exercise training
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13075-019-2036-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kasper Yde Jensen, Mikkel Jacobsen, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Per Aagaard, Jakob Lindberg Nielsen, Anders Nørkær Jørgensen, Eleanor Boyle, Rune Dueholm Bech, Sofie Rosmark, Louise Pyndt Diederichsen, Ulrik Frandsen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,837,101
of 14,526,769 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,145
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,228
of 318,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#212
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,526,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.