You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating the implementation of the PACE Steps to Success Programme in long-term care facilities in seven countries according to the RE-AIM framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0953-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mariska Oosterveld-Vlug, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Maud ten Koppel, Hein van Hout, Tinne Smets, Lara Pivodic, Marc Tanghe, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Jo Hockley, Sheila Payne, Danni Collingridge Moore, Violetta Kijowska, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Marika Kylänen, Suvi Leppäaho, Claudia Mercuri, Paola Rossi, Martina Mercuri, Giovanni Gambassi, Catherine Bassal, Emilie Morgan de Paula, Yvonne Engels, Luc Deliens, Lieve Van den Block, H. Roeline Pasman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Luxembourg | 4 | 18% |
Spain | 3 | 14% |
South Africa | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
Scientists | 7 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 52 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 53 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,228,329
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#493
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,728
of 458,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.