↓ Skip to main content

Walking in on people in parks: Demonstrating the orderliness of interactional discomfort in urban territorial negotiations

Overview of attention for article published in Emotion, Space and Society, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 243)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Walking in on people in parks: Demonstrating the orderliness of interactional discomfort in urban territorial negotiations
Published in
Emotion, Space and Society, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100648
Authors

Jonathan Ablitt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,240,743
of 15,094,246 outputs
Outputs from Emotion, Space and Society
#28
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,771
of 332,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emotion, Space and Society
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,094,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them