You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit–harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002998 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom Callender, Mark Emberton, Steve Morris, Ros Eeles, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Nora Pashayan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 8 | 22% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Jordan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 47% |
| Scientists | 13 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#220,078
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#419
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,226
of 475,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#12
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.